Sex and Original Sin: How the life and thought of one man was to dominate the Roman Catholic Church’s view of sex down to modern times.
Warning: strip_tags() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/pleasant/public_html/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 631

When we consider the modern sexual politics of the Catholic Church they are, in comparison to those of the broader secular world, quite conservative. What many don’t realise is that much of what makes up the contemporary sexual politics of the Catholic Church stems from the works and thinking of one man: St. Augustine. This essay will explore the life and works of St. Augustine and how it was that he profoundly affected the thinking of both the Catholic Church and the broader secular community right up to the present day.
Essential to understanding the works of St. Augustine is an understanding of his background leading up to his career as a member of the Catholic Church. Augustine lived from 354CE to 430CE and was born to a devout Christian mother and devout Pagan father in Thagaste, a Numidian town. His mother was earnest to raise her son a Christian and this, coupled with Augustine’s brilliant scholarly ability and the patronage of a wealthy benefactor led to his education in Carthage. Augustine took easily to education and he exhibited an insatiable lust for knowledge, coming quickly to grasp Latin and the finer points of rhetoric. Early in his life Augustine had become a teacher of Pagan rhetoric at Carthage, regardless of his mother’s wishes. Augustine was very much his own man who not only went against the wishes of his family (especially his mother) but seemed to often behave in an actively antagonistic fashion. Augustine had a self-professed and over-active libido and, much against his mother’s wishes, Augustine took a concubine with whom he had a child, named Adeodatus, meaning “the gift of god”. Riling against his mother’s desire for him to seek Christian spiritual guidance, Augustine joined a Persian derived sect called the Manichaeans who related evil to matter and the realm of the physical. His devotion to the Manichaeans was shaken, however, when he met Bishop Ambrose at the request of his mother. Ambrose answered many of the Manichaeans’ objections to the Old Testament and exposed many of the flaws of Manichaean thinking with an eloquence and intellectual strength that amazed Augustine. The influence of Ambrose on Augustine was profound, as Bainton notes “here was a man who grappled with the problems of faith and who showed that one could be an intellectual and a Christian”. During Easter in 387CE Augustine and his son were baptised by Ambrose. Soon after this Augustine became a monk and then, in 396CE became a bishop in the town of Hippo in Northern Africa.
Throughout his career Augustine never lost his love of the scholarly pursuits and spent much of his time reading about and writing on Christian theology. Much of this seemed to be fueled by his apparent obsession with his own sexuality and with the nature of human sexuality in general. This is best displayed in his reflective autobiography and spiritual treatise Confessions which first appeared in 397CE. This document formed the core of what would become Augustinian sexual politics and, eventually, Catholic doctrine. Central to Augustine’s notion of human sexuality is that of Original Sin. According to Augustine, man was irreversibly corrupted by the fall of Adam and is inescapably tied to his sin against God. Adam’s (and by association man’s) punishment for disobedience to God was one of forced disobedience to one’s self. This is essentially the notion that the human body and mind became separate and opposed to one another. The free will of the human mind could no longer exert itself to control the base desires of the flesh. This is most notably present, Augustine claims, in the sexual passions of human beings. Augustine observed that sexual arousal seems to occur automatically, regardless of what the mind desires. Augustine saw this as proof that the body’s disobedience of the mind often manifested itself in the form of lust. The central problem for this explanation of the uncontrollable sexual desires of mankind was explaining how it is that something that Adam did could condemn every subsequent human.

Unlike the archaic biological notion of preformationism (which suggested that a child existed perfectly formed in miniature inside of its parent’s sex cells, extending all the way back to Adam and Eve), Augustine contended that the entire human lineage had not existed within Adam but that the whole of Adam had been corrupted, including his semen. This meant that every child that Adam created was imbued with evil, sinful seed which passed his sin onto all of his children. Therefore all descendants of Adam (that being the entire human race) were created with fundamentally flawed semen and inherited the Original Sin from all of their descendants. The implications for Augustine arriving at this conclusion were enormous. If all human beings were inherently flawed and sinful, then that meant they could not possibly be trusted to administer to anything without the constant guidance of God. This meant that perfection or a utopian, peaceful existence was impossible for mankind. Furthermore, if we couldn’t trust our bodies to behave appropriately towards sexual desire (because of the rampant influence of lust) then how were we to know what kind of sexual interaction or attraction was safe in the eyes of God? The only safe solution, according to Augustine, was to only have sex for the purposes of procreation which meant that only sex within marriage was acceptable. Augustine contended that the physical act of sex itself was not sinful, but that it was inexplicably linked to a lustful sexual desire that caused man to lose his rational control of himself and his body. However, because God ordained the marital bond, the lustful experience of sex within marriage was far more acceptable than sex outside of marriage that wasn’t for the purpose of procreation.
There was naturally opposition to these views. The transition from the writings of one man to official Church doctrine was by no means an instant or unanimous one. Julian of Eclanum was appalled at the notion that human sexuality or semen could in any way be sinful or anything but completely natural:
God made bodies, distinguished the sexes, made
genitalia, bestowed affection through which bodies
would be joined, gave power to the semen, and
operates in the secret nature of the semen – and
God made nothing evil.
-As quoted in Elaine Pagels, Adam, Eve and the Serpent, p. 132
So why would St. Augustine’s beliefs become adopted by the Catholic Church as doctrine? One possible explanation is that it would have been a very effective way for the Church to assert its place and power within society. If mankind cannot be trusted to control his base physical urges and requires a constant spiritual communion with God to save his eternal soul, then the Church is there, ready to offer spiritual guidance. If human beings cannot be trusted to govern themselves without the guidance of God, and the Church is the representative God on Earth, then that places the Church in a unique position of power. This alone could not account for the adoption of Augustine’s stance on Original Sin. Elane Pagels suggests that is the simplicity and compelling nature Augustine’s theory that allowed it to endure. In the face of human suffering, it answers the question of “why is this happening to me” by simply and efficiently removing the immediate blame from the individual and placing it on our collective ancestors, Adam and Eve. Augustine’s thinking tells us not only the cause of our suffering but also gives our suffering meaning and significance. The other advantage in this kind of thinking is that it removes much of the responsibility or guilt which stem from suffering or wicked behaviour by removing the blame from the individual. If good and evil are predetermined and we’re all sinners, then we can do anything we like as long as we ask God for forgiveness and absolution.

Let us now consider the legacy that St. Augustine has left and where it endures to this day. The Catholic Church still has a hard-line policy with regards to sex. Sex before marriage is unacceptable, sex is to be strictly for procreation and, as a result, contraception is strictly forbidden. Catholic priests are celibate, in order to turn their attention wholly towards matters spiritual. We need to understand, however, that St. Augustine’s thinking has had a wide-reaching and insidious effect on broader, secular society. We are very body conscious and have a number of nudity taboos (such as the generally negative view of public breast-feeding or nude swimming) and tend to frown on excessive premarital sex (especially in the case of women). While contraception is more acceptable in secular society it is often more for its uses as a means to prevent sexually transmitted diseases or allow for family planning amongst married people or couples in ‘committed relationships’.
In conclusion, the works and thinking of St. Augustine has had a powerful effect on both the thinking of the Catholic Church and broader secular society. The concept of Original Sin provided both a platform for the Church to assert itself within society and a mechanism with which the lay person could rationalise and understand suffering in their lives and in the world in general. Many of the central elements of Augustinian politics are preserved in the beliefs and social conventions of both the Catholic Church and secular society to this day. St Augustine may not be a figure of popular conversation but when we examine his life and his works we can see how profoundly one individual can personally alter the thinking of millions.
Further Reading
- Bainton, Roland, The Penguin History of Christianity, Vol. 1, London, Nelson, 1964, pp. 129-135

- Chadwick, Henry, The Early Church, London, Hodder Stoughton, 1968, pp. 216-236

- Pagels, Elaine, Adam, Eve and the Serpent,New York, Random House, 1988, pp. 98-150

Related posts:
- Technology, Illusion and Authority in the Life and Works of Georges Méliès
- The awakening of dark gods: Modern horror writing and Carl Jung’s notion of divine evil
- The Origins and Gradual Adoption of Monotheism Amongst the Ancient Israelites
- David Cronenberg: Sexual Genius!
- Srdan Dragojevic’s Rane and the Rise of Wound Culture in Post-Yugolsav Wars Serbia
What a cockhead!!
Jim.
St. Augustine I mean.
I gathered!
You made my day :D
Thanks again for the wonderful Podcast. I’ll be in touch soon with more porn and sexy sex from the annals of the past!
so basically one guy a bajillion years in the past fucked us all over by making fucking not acceptable. What a fucker… =.=
Sounds good! We linked to this from our site as well. ;)
you guys r fucking mean btw im 15 but really his not all that bad rite?
Martin, your essay is interesting, however, it does not mention St Paul who did much more in my opinion to ruin our lives, than your protagonist did ..I admit Augustine must have been smoknig something that would kill a camel but be that as it may, St Paul must surly be you next tagret
So long and thanks for the fish
PPD
Never mind Paul, how about Jesus? “If anyone looks at a women lustfully he has committed adultery with her in his heart.” How about all the writers of the Bible starting with Moses? It is ridiculous to say that somehow this was all Augustine’s idea, although he was a wise and eloquent man and did have a big influence on the thinking of the church. Sure perhaps the church — I mean the Catholic one, as opposed to the true church — used his ideas for political purposes. They have used many ideas for political purposes but that is why they aren’t the real church. Anyway you people are fools if you don’t want to keep sex within marriage and don’t think that lust is a serious problem. You should learn something from the testimony of Augustine’s life.
I was wondering how long it would take for one of the faithful to chime in.
Moss, it pains me to ask, but did you read the whole article or just the opening and closing paragraphs?
This article doesn’t suggest that Augustine was the origin of these ideas, rather that he developed them and is is responsible for cementing them in catholic doctrine. As you may have noted, I talk about contemporaries of Augustine who (by comparison) are wholly in favor of sex in and outside of marriage not to mention for pleasure. But this was never a theological essay, it was always intended to be historical. Which leads me to my next point;
Regarding Jesus, Moses and the rest of them, conservative views on sex are not necessarily synonymous with Augustinian views on sex. The assorted authors of the bible (or those who began the oral traditions that would eventually become scripture) were semtic people living in extremely challenging environments. Conservative views on sex are very important when you live in the Judean desert with no surefire way to control your population. Craft specialization, agriculture and (particularly in the last couple of centuries) contraception make the need for enforcing strict marriage laws less essential to keeping the population stable.
I submit to you that you are a fool for thinking that sex outside of wedlock is relevant as a contentious issue or cause for outrage.
Commentaries about lust are not in line with what is known about the teachings of Jesus and his perspectives after reviewing the apocrypha. It stands to reason that most of what is written in the canonized bible regarding sex and marriage would have been put there by those constructing a corporate institution with an eye toward absolute domination of the worker bees. Jesus was not himself even allied with the notion of his divinity, and his own teachings were geared more toward healing and brotherly love than any sort of approach to life and love that would be anything other than respectful of the importance of human empathy. I wish people arguing for the validity of the tales in the bible would tear their focus away from it just long enough to see that it is a construct, and that the real myth is that it is faithful to the to the writings of the apostles and the philosophies of Jesus. It’s a corporate manifesto, for fuck’s sake, and should not be taken so seriously as gospel. Even gospel isn’t gospel.
Actually it wasn’t St. Augustine that screwed it up for everyone, or even Paul or Jesus. When you look that the fact that Augustine was a monk and raised a son, as well as many other high officials all the way up to the pope, you begin to see what happened. The whole reason the Roman Catholic Church does not allow there clergy to marry, is because up until about the time of Martin Luther and others of the Reformation these church officials began to promote their family members into various positions of authority. This became seen as a monopoly and whole families of clergy members were getting rich off the backs of the poor because of all this nepotism. This is one of the things of Martin Luther and others so of the Reformation begin to see in the church as corrupt and for good reason so to change the outlook in view of the church it became Tradition for priests, bishop, cardinals and the pope not marry. I mean if you really want to point out immorality during one of the more turbulent times of the church a couple of the popes the one I can think of off the top of my head Pope Clement had a mistress who pretty much ran the church.
I think is kind of naïve To look at one person and say to your fault that the Roman Catholic Church now has these teachings against such things.Many of the Saints or great doctors of the church didn’t always agree with what the Roman Catholic Church had to say St. Benedict pointed out in his role that he didn’t trust priests and that they had the hardest time entering a monastery because of that lack of trust. St. Aelred spoke of special friendships Monks and his monasteries and encourage that type of friendship. Just because Rome says that that is the reason why they’re doing things it doesn’t always mean that that is where they got their teachings delve into history little bit and you’ll find out some very interesting topics. I’ll leave you with this thought did you know that there’s a transsexual pope, look it up.